How it works

How agentic memory becomes usable context.

Authorized signals become canonical identity, qualified memory and a task-bounded context card. Evidence and scope stay inspectable throughout.

Current mechanics are kept distinct from beta correction outcomes and conceptual cross-scope sharing.

Diagram descriptionCandidate mentions pass identifier, context and independent-support gates. Supported mentions resolve to one canonical identity; ambiguous or incompatible mentions remain separate.

Architecture principle

One published memory surface. Private state behind it.

Agents search safe published memory. Source generations, unresolved identities, evidence, conflicts and publication decisions remain private; raw conversations do not become a second search index.

Retrieval reads published memory. Private evidence stays outside routine retrieval. Provenance supports inspection without exposing the full ledger.

The memory lifecycle

Seven controlled transitions, not one opaque model call.

Bound the input, resolve identity, qualify what is known, publish safely, retrieve by scope, and keep correction possible.

  1. 01

    Authorize

    Bound the source set.

    Begin with sources the participant is authorized to use; availability and retention vary by deployment.
  2. 02

    Contribute

    Extract replaceable contributions.

    Each supported input contributes entities, claims, relationships, evidence and temporal bounds.
  3. 03

    Resolve

    Connect mentions to canonical identity.

    Grounded identifiers and compatible support can resolve an entity; a matching name alone cannot.
  4. 04

    Qualify

    Keep status, time and conflict explicit.

    Current, historical, superseded, inferred, uncertain and conflicting memory remain distinguishable.
  5. 05

    Publish

    Build inspectable canonical memory.

    Supported context is projected into readable memory while raw sources and private workflow state stay outside routine retrieval.
  6. 06

    Retrieve

    Return a bounded context card.

    The subject, agent, permitted scope and task determine which already-published context is returned.
  7. 07

    Correct

    Revise without erasing lineage.

    Provenance supports correction and source replacement; the complete customer-facing correction journey remains beta work.

Source availability

Authorize real sources; do not assume a universal connector catalog.

Current evidence supports specific retained conversation, explicit capture, document, trace and wiki-source paths. Calendar, CRM, support, email and product-usage availability varies by deployment.

Authorized conversation contextExplicit memory writesSupported documentsOperational tracesExisting canonical memory

Reachability does not make credentials, regulated material or unusually sensitive data acceptable.

Qualification and control

State tells the agent what it may use—and how.

Time, support, conflict, correction, scope and authority travel with the context instead of hiding behind a confident answer.

Memory qualification and control states
State or controlMeaningAgent treatment
CurrentSupported and presently applicable.Use only within the authorized scope and task.
HistoricalPreviously true or relevant.Use to explain change, not as the current instruction.
SupersededReplaced by newer supported context.Prefer the replacement while preserving lineage.
Inferred or uncertainAn evidence-bounded interpretation or unresolved state.Qualify it and seek confirmation when consequential.
ConflictingActive support disagrees.Surface the conflict; do not silently choose a story.
Correction and replacementOperator controls and source generations can revise published memory.Current ledger mechanics; the complete self-service customer journey remains beta.
Scope and authorityCurrent retrieval is bounded inside the verified deployment.Broader personal and organizational isolation and selected sharing remain product direction. Memory never authorizes external action.

Closed beta

Evaluate the memory before trusting the answer.

Review identity, evidence, freshness, conflicts and retrieved scope—not only whether the final response sounds plausible.